There is just too much adversity in the open source community, and sadly sometimes it comes from within.
There are two blogs going at it, “BoycottNovell” and “BoycottboycottNovell”…
Lefty of BBN writes about those who are fighting for free and open source in the name of purity. While I don’t doubt Lefty’s commitment to the open source community, he is doing what he finds so appalling, attacking other free
and open source advocates. The way I look at it, Roy Schestowitz of BN is making a valuable contribution by watching what the real adversary (Microsoft) is up to. Now, I don’t always agree with everything at the BoycottNovell site, but by no means am I going to throw the baby out with the bathwater.
I hearby call for a truce for these two and everyone else who is in current conflict. We don’t have time to fight among ourselves. We’ve got 21 months to go here.
Why can’t we all get along? I see five problems here.
Point #1: the quest of software purity is exhausting
Rob Landley gave up on the Linux desktop due to purity disgust. This is particularly sad due to the fact that Rob and Eric Raymond wrote a paper in 2006 giving the Windows operating system a two year deadline in which to die. Oh, and for the record, it was Rob Landley who coined the phrase “GandhiCon3″ when Eric Raymond typed it.
Instead, I believe, we should not make open source users feel guilty for the proprietary driver. Nor is running that special piece of software they can’t live without that requires Wine or Windows worth getting all excited about. Insulting users who are already doing what they can is not at all helpful.
Point #2: bigotry still exists
This year women have been visibly under distress, yet, I prefer to look at the root cause which is bigotry. The same people who have seen me as being less competent because I am a woman would likely reject someone of another race, orientation, disability, or any other status that makes them look “different” in the eyes of the bigot.
Point #3: distro wars
Shawn Powers of the Linux Journal noted this problem during his Ohio LinuxFest keynote: “When I do a video demonstrating something with Ubuntu, I get so much hate mail.” While I use 4 different Linux distributions, I understand how someone could have their favourite. What I don’t get is why people feel the need to get insulting about it. When
it comes down down to it, there is no point to being unreasonable with the BSD users if you are a Linux user. And vice-versa. We are one free and open source community. We came from the same UNIX roots, we use the same open source software, and we are going the same direction.
Point #4: elitism blocking new users from getting started, let alone contributing
Folks, there are more than 33 million people, each month, downloading open source
software from sourceforge.net
Due to the large amount of activity of people downloading open source
software, the “average user” myths are busted:
- does not care to use open source software
- will not trust free as in cost software
- can not have the ability to make their own software choices and install the packages themselves
- only wants to buy shrink-wrapped big box software
It’s about time we quit trading “I spent three weeks downloading slackware floppies” stories with one-up-ditude. Instead we need to be phasing in open source where it makes sense. We will be surprised by the numbers of heads that don’t explode with the idea of saying goodbye to Microsoft.
Point #5: so, what’s your contribution?
I personally have contributed to the success of over events, installed Linux over 1000 times, and used by choice open source software for over ten years. Yet, over this time, I have not contributed one bit of code. Nor am I going to let an elitist make me feel gulity about it. My efforts has brought more people to Linux than I will ever know. Still, after over ten years of giving back, I’m still needing to defend the answer to the question “who are you?” Excuse me, isn’t this a meritocracy?
You do not need to “be a big name” in the open source community to make a real difference.
Who are the people I see who are doing great things for the community without ever making a single code contribution? Here’s a few: Ken Starks, Amber Granger, Michelle Hall, Rikki Kite. Never heard of them? Well, that’s part of the point. We need to look at contributions for their net gain, not the lines of code.
Being a centrist is the best way I have found to bring a diverse group of people to partake, enjoy, and celebrate the joy that is free and open source software. Right now I declare
ENOUGH already on the in-fighting!
Why? Let’s face it.
We need a new and diverse group of folks to get to GandhiCon4.
Who’s with me?
This content is published under the Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license.
Like
Free Analytics
W3Schools


I agree that the level of infighting over purity in the open source community has gotten a bit ludicrous. Even Linus said:
I consider myself an open-source advocate, but will stop considering myself so the day I’m “required” to completely eschew proprietary solutions. Tools are tools.
There can’t be a truce with conspiracy theorists and trolls like BoycotNovell.
Point#1:
The whole argument is silly. And nobody who matters cares. Do RMS or ESR even write code anymore? Or code anyone other than themselves uses. I use a LINUX desktop for ALL my work, I know numerous other people who do… and neither I nor them care about “purity” at all. It is just plain stupid. I run proprietary apps on my GNOME desktop [yes, there is quite an ecosystem of proprietary apps that run on LINUX very well].
Point#2:
Note where most of these tasteless remarks come from – the purity advocates [aka conspiracy theorists] like RMS. In short: they have done a great job at discrediting themselves. Bye guys, and good riddance. Open Source is better off without these guys.
Point#3:
Again, just ignore these guys. But the Ubuntu guys should maybe take a hint: stop talking like you INVENTED the LINUX desktop or wrote the software you PACKAGE! Of course people get pissed off. I’ve sat next to *DEVELOPERS* while they got pissed of by people trumpeting how great *THEIR* software was. Hey – you PACKAGED IT, you DID NOT WRITE IT. Just stop saying Ubuntu/Fedora/openSUSE and say LINUX/GNOME… because that is what it is. Give credit where credit is due. To many distro-advocates act like credit suckers.
Point #4
Download counts are entirely meaningless as a measure of use or market penetration.
Point #5
I agree. Non-code contributions are very important.. But you also loose the right to flame developers and inform them of the “obvious” features or behavours their software should have.
Eric Raymond is not a free software purist. In fact, he made a big to-do when switching from fedora to ubuntu because he wanted access to third-party software…
http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/eric-raymond-dumps-fedora-core.html
I reserve the right to criticize the software products I use. Open or closed source.
Adam:
Where have Ubuntu Developers ever claimed to have written all the software? On the other hand, many UDs *do* do work upstream. And there are some Ubuntu-specific changes (just as there are SUSE-specific changes to things), so it can make sense to specify on which distro you’re having an issue.
I usually see devs say “you can’t complain if you haven’t filed a bug,” which makes sense to me.